When women are involved in politics today are they, as Pettman states, “under current masculinist arrangements?” Do women, with regards to politics, have to act as a man at times, or on “his” terms to succeed, as Pettman suggests?
Although it seems unfair that a woman should be limited to this “private” space while the man can run freely between the "public and private" world, as Pettman says, would it be possible for a woman to gain political power without ever crossing her “confined” boundaries? How can a woman take political action and be involved with the state if she doesn't leave her home? Is having a political opinion enough?
No comments:
Post a Comment